Hi all. You’ll be happy to know that we now do a weekly book review on anything concerning social issues, politics, human rights, the news, international affairs, the media etc. We start with Sanjay’s book “Cheating Death”.
Decades ago, a comatose patient, a person who drowned, or even a patient with a deadly heart disease would have been declared dead as soon as they flat line. Doctors would not have done anything else if they seemed to have tried everything to revive these people. These are a few of the hopeless cases that even medicine cannot do anything about.
However, the question is, what if something can still be done to bring these people back to life? What if medicine can go as far as reviving someone who has been dead for hours?
Several years later, as technology advanced and more discoveries in the medical field have been made, Dr. Sanjay Gupta now reveals the science behind medical miracles that have never really been discussed. Intriguing? Perhaps this book has become one of the most talked about books of 2009 since it covers concepts that have not been completely accepted by many.
Seeing that it is argued about by a lot of readers and professionals alike, what exactly makes Cheating Death so intriguing? In the book, Dr. Sanjay Gupta basically chronicles the would-have-been fatal cases where patients survive and surprisingly able live normal lives afterward. What makes it intriguing is that the idea of reviving patients who have been declared dead even for hours can still be revived is discussed. It shows readers the human body’s extraordinary capability of survival and how far medicine can go to postpone the death of a person.
A lot of people find the book very interesting and lively. It is creatively written in a way that as if the reader is watching Discovery Health and Rescue 911 all at the same time – it is learning concepts combined with an action-filled style as real-life cases are discussed. However, this is not just the reason why people continuously talk about the book.
The idea of being able to save a person’s life who was in death’s doorstep has, indeed, fascinated and intrigued a lot of fans and critics. The concept gave hope to many readers, but also troubled others. There has been a lot of talk that Cheating Death’s concepts are misleading the readers. According to critics, the book seems to convey the idea that every deadly case can still be saved; and this belief leads people to think twice about donating organs hoping that a loved one might still be able to be revived. Also, others argue that the book is filled with medical errors. Critics point out the confusion between medical terms such as permanent vegetation, brain death, and comatose.
Despite the many clashes in opinions, it is still a personal choice whether to throw away or believe the idea of medical miracles that Dr. Sanjay Gupta wrote about in Cheating Death. There is nothing wrong about being critical, but there are indeed certain occurrences that happen yet we cannot explain – such as being revived from death. At the same time, though, there is nothing wrong with being hopeful; however, there are limitations. In the end, every one will come face to face with death and there is nothing else to be done but to let go. We are not gods, and we can only go so far in saving a person’s life.









































3 Comments
November 9, 2009 at 7:27 pm
Gupta has done a grave disservice to many innocent people. In the book, on his TV show, and in interviews promoting the book, Gupta is unmistakably confusing coma, persistant vegetative state, and brain death. He’s clearly linking his stories of recovery from vegetative state with brain death and organ procurement for transplantation. Brain death is an entirely separate condition from both persistant vegetative state, and coma. Mark Ragucci was never declared brain dead. (http://www.nyuhjd.org/rusk/news/articles/11_23_ragucci.html). The NIH (www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/coma/coma.htm), and many other institions and organizations concerned with medical information, take pains to inform the public that brain death is distinct. When a family is informed of a declaration of brain death they shouldn’t have to feel that medical professionals are conspiring and failing to save their loved one. Yet Gupta seems determined to convince the public that brain death is just vegetative state, and that medical professionals are just reluctant to help the “brain dead”.
See pgs. 140 and 142 of the book. See Fresh Air transcripts for a particular egregious example of his misinforming about brain death promoting the book (http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=113681104)
For an example of his being criticized in the peer reviewed liturature for his misinformation campaign see Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Volume 35 Issue 2, Pages 273 – 281. I’m hoping for more following release of this book.
Why is he doing this? I can only guess. Its a far more dramatic story, and something sure to make him more money, to claim that more isn’t done to save the brain dead because surgeons want organs for transplant. Organ transplantation has always sparked a primal irrational fear, generating more urban legends and ghoulish stories than any other medical procedure. Next of kin often refuse to allow organ donation because of the feeling that something ghoulish is being done with their loved one, and the suspicion that they are being allowed to die for someone else’s benefit. Any number of news organizations, even respected ones, have, at one time or another, repeated the most bizarre urban legends of organ snatching as verified events. CNN has recently aired several reports claiming a vast US organ black market exists based on friend of a friend reports and one arrest of someone attempting to broker a kidney sale. Don’t expect any followup reports or arrests.
November 10, 2009 at 9:30 pm
No criticism of Gupta’s mistakes allowed? This is the future of journalism. Please note that this mistake will cost lives on the transplant waiting lists.
November 13, 2009 at 3:46 pm
I’m the owner but logged out. I wanted to say, thanks for your views…I haven’t read the book myself so I don’t know but I’m reading it now.